##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Sucipto Langga

Abstract

This research proposes a cross-domain autonomy framework for automation in biomedical and agricultural systems—spanning autonomous surgery, precision agriculture, and assistive exoskeletons—by integrating self-supervised multimodal perception, constraint-based planning–control (Model Predictive Control/MPC with safety filter Control Barrier Functions/CBF), and meta-learning-based fast personalization. The architecture is implemented on low-latency edge computing and evaluated through a standardized protocol linking technical metrics, safety, and operational benefits. In surgical tasks, the proposed method reduces path error by ~39% (1.7 mm vs. 2.8 mm), peak force by ~22% (3.2 N vs. 4.1 N), and constraint violations by ~93% (0.04 vs. 0.60 events/min), with latency <50 ms. In precision agriculture, the system improved weed detection mAP to 0.78, decreased geolocation error to 3.9 cm, reduced nozzle drift to 9.6 cm, and saved 34.5% on average input without sacrificing dose uniformity (CV 17.5% vs. 21.0%). In the exoskeleton, CBF-constrained few-shot personalization reduced metabolic cost by −12.4%, improved step symmetry to 0.90 and user comfort to 4.3/5, while reducing constraint violations by 10× (0.02 vs. 0.20 events/min). The key novelty lies in cross-domain transferable “autonomy primitives” with formal safety guarantees, combined with rapid adaptation at low data cost. Results demonstrate that the framework is safe, adaptive, and efficient, ready to accelerate translation from the laboratory to clinical practice, production fields, and rehabilitation.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Langga, S. (2025). Automation In Biomedical Or Agricultural Systems Autonomous Surgery Precision Agriculture Assistive Exoskeletons. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2(02), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.54209/elimensi.v2i02.420
References
[1] A. Shademan, R. S. Decker, J. D. Opfermann, S. Leonard, A. Krieger, and P. C. W. Kim, “Supervised autonomous robotic soft tissue surgery,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 8, no. 337, 2016, Art. no. 337ra64. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad9398.
[2] J. Zhang et al., “Human-in-the-loop optimization of exoskeleton assistance during walking,” Science, vol. 356, no. 6344, pp. 1280–1284, 2017. doi: 10.1126/science.aal5054.
[3] Y. Ding, M. Kim, S. Kuindersma, and C. J. Walsh, “Human-in-the-loop optimization of hip assistance with a soft exosuit during walking,” Science Robotics, vol. 3, no. 15, 2018, eaar5438. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aar5438.
[4] R. Gebbers and V. I. Adamchuk, “Precision agriculture and food security,” Science, vol. 327, no. 5967, pp. 828–831, 2010. doi: 10.1126/science.1183899.
[5] A. Kamilaris and F. X. Prenafeta-Boldú, “Deep learning in agriculture: A survey,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 147, pp. 70–90, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.016.
[6] L. J. Thompson and L. A. Puntel, “Transforming UAV and multispectral sensor into a practical decision support system for precision nitrogen management in corn,” Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 10, 1597, 2020. doi: 10.3390/rs12101597.
[7] A. D. Ames, S. Coogan, M. Egerstedt, G. Notomista, K. Sreenath, and P. Tabuada, “Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applications,” in Proc. 18th European Control Conf. (ECC), 2019, pp. 3420–3431. doi: 10.23919/ECC.2019.8796030.
[8] A. Clark, “Control barrier functions for stochastic systems,” Automatica, vol. 130, 2021, 109688. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2021.109688.
[9] A. D. Ames, X. Xu, J. W. Grizzle, and P. Tabuada, “Control Barrier Function based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systems,” arXiv, 2016. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1609.06408.
[10] J. B. Rawlings, D. Q. Mayne, and M. Diehl, Model Predictive Control: Theory, Computation, and Design, 2nd ed. Nob Hill Publishing, 2017. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719130.
[11] T. Chen, S. Kornblith, M. Norouzi, and G. Hinton, “A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representations (SimCLR),” in Proc. ICML, 2020. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2002.05709.
[12] K. He, X. Chen, S. Xie, Y. Li, P. Dollár, and R. Girshick, “Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners,” in Proc. CVPR, 2022, pp. 16000–16009. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01553.
[13] D. Wang, E. Shelhamer, S. Liu, B. Olshausen, and T. Darrell, “Tent: Fully Test-Time Adaptation by Entropy Minimization,” ICLR, 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2006.10726.
[14] T. Chen et al., “TVM: An Automated End-to-End Optimizing Compiler for Deep Learning,” in Proc. OSDI, 2018, pp. 578–594. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1802.04799.
[15] G. Xu, Z. Li, and M. Gong, “Exploring Self-Supervised Learning for Multi-Modal Remote Sensing Image Classification,” Remote Sensing, vol. 15, no. 24, 5682, 2023. doi: 10.3390/rs15245682.
[16] S. Ravikumar et al., “Real-time nitrogen monitoring and management to improve nitrogen use efficiency: A review,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.108981.
[17] A. D. Ames, “Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs with Application to Adaptive Cruise Control,” in Proc. American Control Conf. (ACC), 2014, pp. 4545–4551. doi: 10.1109/ACC.2014.6859117.
[18] C. Finn, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine, “Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks,” in Proc. ICML, 2017, pp. 1126–1135. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1703.03400