A Contextual Interpretation of the Book of Micah: Social Justice and Marginalized People in Indonesia
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
This study interprets the Book of Micah contextually to formulate a public ethics relevant to social justice in Indonesia, particularly for marginalized groups such as indigenous communities, urban informal workers, coastal communities, and religious minorities. Using a qualitative design-Using an interpretive approach with an abductive flow, the research combines exegesis (Micah 2:1–5; 3:1–12; 6:6–8; 7:1–7) and socio-policy analysis of Indonesia (2015–2025) through open/thematic/axial coding, source triangulation, and the frameworks of liberation theology, postcolonial hermeneutics, and public theology. The results demonstrate Micah's three ethical axes—doing justice,ḥesed (loyalty/solidarity), and humility before God—resonate with issues of land grabbing, judicial corruption, unequal access to basic services, and the crisis of leadership integrity. The research's main contribution is the development of a Theological-Policy Translation Matrix that links exegetical findings with policy issues, key actors, practical recommendations (e.g., legal aid clinics, customary-based mediation, open budget forums, citizen education), and evaluation indicators (accountability, participation, inclusiveness). The findings confirm thatḥESD does not stop at individual compassion, but rather demands a just and auditable social architecture. Limitations of the study include the illustrative nature of the data and the need for policy updates. Moving forward, the development of Micah's cross-sector justice indicators and longitudinal testing of intervention effectiveness are recommended to strengthen the transformative impact of prophetic interpretation in Indonesian public practice.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
[2] Waltke, B. K. (2007). A Commentary on Micah. Wm. B. Eerdmans. Eerdmans Publishing Co+1
[3] Brueggemann, W. (2001). The Prophetic Imagination (2nd ed.). Fortress Press. Amazon+2logos.com+2
[4] Wright, C. J. H. (2004). Old Testament Ethics for the People of God. IVP Academic. ivpress.com+1
[5] Davis, E. F. (2009). Scripture, Culture, and Agriculture: An Agrarian Reading of the Bible. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press & Assessment+1
[6] Sugirtharajah, R. S. (2012). Postcolonial Criticism and Biblical Interpretation. Oxford University Press. Oxford University Press
[7] Gutiérrez, G. (1988/1973). A Theology of Liberation: History, Politics, and Salvation. Orbis Books. Orbis Books+1
[8] Kim, S. (2011). Theology in the Public Sphere: Public Theology as a Catalyst for Open Debate. SCM Press. scmpress.hymnsam.co.uk
[9] Bretherton, L. (2019). Christ and the Common Life: Political Theology and the Case for Democracy. Wm. B. Eerdmans. Eerdmans Publishing Co
[10] Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2025, 15 Jan). Gini Ratio September 2024 tercatat sebesar 0,381. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia+1
[11] Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2025, 25 Jul). Gini Ratio Maret 2025 tercatat sebesar 0,375. Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia
[12] Konsorsium Pembaruan Agraria (KPA). (2024). Catatan Akhir Tahun 2023: Dekade Krisis Agraria… (Laporan). kpa.or.id+1
[13] Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2025). Laporan Tahunan 2024: Meneguhkan Pengawasan, Memajukan Pencegahan Maladministrasi. ombudsman.go.id+1
[14] Human Rights Watch. (2024). World Report 2024: Indonesia. Human Rights Watch
[15] Human Rights Watch. (2024, 29 Oct). Religious Intolerance, Discriminatory Regulations Against Minorities in Indonesia. Human Rights Watch
[16] World Bank. (2025). Indonesia Economic Prospects (IEP) — koleksi laporan berkala. World Bank
[17] World Bank. (2025). Poverty and Inequality Platform (PIP): Indonesia Country Profile. pip.worldbank.org
[18] WALHI (Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia). (2025). Environmental Outlook 2025 (TLH 2025)