##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Diki Darmawan

Abstract

The 4.0 era places early childhood to adolescence in a digital ecosystem that shapes mindsets, habits, and practices of faith. This study developed and tested a cross-level Christian Digital Literacy Model (PAUD–SMA) based on a spiral curriculum that integrates four pillars: (1) digital competencies (access, analysis, creation, collaboration), (2) practical theology with a biblical narrative lens (creation–fall–redemption–restoration), (3) digital spiritual disciplines (short prayers, digital sabbaths, media examinations), and (4) compassionate digital citizenship. Using a mixed-methods approach within a Design-Based Research framework (co-design → prototype → pilot → randomized quasi-experimental field test per class), data were collected through literacy/disposition/practice scales, situational tests, digital artifact rubrics, fidelity observations, LMS logs, and FGDs/reflective journals.


Results indicate significant improvements in cognitive (faith-based digital literacy), affective (compassion, discourse civility, citation honesty), and practical (digital sabbath habits and media examination), with medium to high effect sizes for cognitive and medium for affective–practical. Micro-liturgical practices served as habitus-forming mechanisms that sustained habit retention into short-term follow-up, while home–school–church collaboration strengthened the transfer of virtues to contexts beyond the classroom. Artifacts/portfolios demonstrated improvements in content quality, honest citations, and compassionate counter-speech practices. The research concludes that digital spaces are effectively positioned as spaces for faith formation, not simply distribution channels. The resulting model, assessment tools, and parenting guidance are ready for replication with contextual adaptations, while regular reinforcement sessions and longitudinal studies are recommended to assess the resilience of habits in the medium to long term.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
[1] Campbell, H. A., & Tsuria, R. (Eds.). (2021). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in digital media (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295683 Taylor & Francis
[2] Campbell, H. A., & Garner, S. (2016). Networked theology: Negotiating faith in digital culture. Baker Academic. Baker Publishing Group
[3] Hodøl, H. O., & Silkoset, R. (2021). Norwegian Christian churches’ use of social media. Journal of Media and Religion, 20(3), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2021.1954829 Taylor & Francis Online
[4] Hildebrandt, J. (2021). Personal Bible reading and the faith formation of youth in the digital age. Journal of Youth and Theology, 20(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1163/24055093-02002004 Brill
[5] UNESCO. (2021). Media and Information Literacy Curriculum (E-version). https://www.unesco.org/mil4teachers/en/curriculum UNESCO
[6] American Academy of Pediatrics. (2016). Media use in school-aged children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162592. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2592 Pediatrics+1
[7] American Academy of Pediatrics. (2016). Media and young minds. Pediatrics, 138(5), e20162591. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2591 Pediatrics
[8] Common Sense Education. (2020). Digital Citizenship Curriculum: Overview (K–12). https://www.commonsense.org/education/digital-citizenship Common Sense+1
[9] London School of Economics & Political Science (LSE). (2024). Evaluation of the Common Sense Digital Citizenship Curriculum (UK adaptation). https://www.lse.ac.uk/…/Digital-Citizenship-Curriculum-Evaluation-Report-high-res-web-version-V6.pdf LSE
[10] American Academy of Pediatrics. (2023). Updated AAP Family Media Plan goes beyond screen time. AAP News. https://publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/24171/ Pediatrics
[11] Moreno, M. A., et al. (2021). Effect of a Family Media Use Plan on media rule engagement. JAMA Pediatrics, 175(1), 93–95. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3863 PMC
[12] McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351601764 Taylor & Francis+1
[13] Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682 SpringerLink
[14] Jiménez, A. M. (2024). Engaging with social media to spread the Gospel in a transmodern, digital world. Journal of Religion in Europe, 18(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1163/18748929-bja10079 Brill
[15] Evolvi, G. (2022). The theory of hypermediation: Anti-gender Christian activism online. Journal of Media and Religion, 21(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2022.2059302 Taylor & Francis Online
[16] Oderinde, P. A. (2023). Disembodied congregations: COVID-19 and rising e-parishes. Review of Ecumenical Studies Sibiu. https://doi.org/10.30965/27507955-20230009 Brill
[17] Li, L. (2025). Digital citizenship education at the early childhood level. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 19, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-025-00153-2 SpringerOpen
[18] Common Sense Media. (2024). Digital Citizenship Curriculum: Impact Report (June 2024). https://www.commonsensemedia.org/…/digital-citizenship-curriculum-impact-report_june-2024.pdf Common Sense Media
[19] Roberto, J. (2018). Faith formation with a new generation. Lifelong Faith Associates. (Open PDF). https://www.lifelongfaith.com/uploads/…/faith_formation_with_a_new_generation_book__2018_.pdf Lifelong Faith
[20] Cross, K. (2025). A theology of social media crisis interaction and mental well-being. Journal of Religion, Media and Digital Culture.