Peralihan Kode dan Identitas Sosial di Ruang Digital Remaja Urban: Perspektif Sosiolinguistik Variasionis” (Sociolinguistics)
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Berangkat dari meningkatnya penetrasi media sosial dan aplikasi percakapan di kalangan remaja urban, studi ini menelaah bagaimana praktik peralihan kode (code-switching) membentuk dan dinegosiasikan bersama identitas sosial di ruang digital. Berbasis perspektif Sosiolinguistik Variasionis, penelitian ini memadukan analisis korpus percakapan daring remaja (platform chat dan media sosial) dengan wawancara singkat berfokus pada praktik bahasa sehari-hari. Variabel sosial seperti jenis kelamin, jaringan pertemanan, komunitas hobi, serta indeks mobilitas digital dipertautkan dengan fitur kebahasaan (frekuensi peralihan intra-/inter-kalimat, domain leksikal, dan penanda pragmatis). Analisis kuantitatif dilakukan untuk memodelkan keterkaitan antara faktor sosial dan peluang terjadinya peralihan kode, sementara pembacaan kualitatif menelusuri fungsi identitasnya—misalnya sebagai strategi afiliasi, gaya, humor, atau pengelolaan jarak sosial. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa (1) peralihan kode meningkat pada topik yang menandai keanggotaan komunitas global/pop culture; (2) penanda pragmatis bahasa Inggris berperan sebagai “stance marker” untuk menampilkan kecakapan digital dan kosmopolitan; dan (3) pola peralihan berbeda lintas jejaring—lebih padat dalam mikrokomunitas kreatif dibanding ruang semi-publik. Kontribusi teoretis studi ini adalah penguatan jembatan antara model variabel sosiolinguistik dan performativitas identitas di ruang digital, sementara kontribusi praktisnya memberi rujukan literasi bahasa bagi pendidik/orang tua dalam memahami gaya tutur remaja. Implikasi metodologis menegaskan manfaat pendekatan korpus-plus-etnografi ringan untuk menangkap dinamika identitas yang lincah dan kontekstual di platform digital.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
[2] P. Kundur et al., “Definition and classification of power system stability,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1387–1401, May 2004. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2004.825981.
[3] K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, Apr. 2002. doi:10.1109/4235.996017.
[4] T.-T. Nguyen and F. Mohammadi, “Optimal placement of TCSC for congestion management and power loss reduction using multi-objective genetic algorithm,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 2813, 2020. doi:10.3390/su12072813.
[5] O. Ziaee and F.F. Choobineh, “Optimal location–allocation of TCSC devices on a transmission network,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 94–102, Jan. 2017. doi:10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2556424.
[6] D. Chatterjee and A. Ghosh, “TCSC control design for transient stability improvement of a power system,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 77, no. 3–4, pp. 470–483, 2007. (Abstract link).
[7] AD Del Rosso, CA Cañizares, and VM Doña, “A study of TCSC controller design for power system stability improvement,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1487–1496, Nov. 2003. (Open copy).
[8] C.R. Fuerte-Esquivel, E. Acha, and H. Ambriz-Pérez, “A thyristor controlled series compensator model for the power flow solution of practical power networks,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 58–64, Feb. 2000. doi:10.1109/59.852101.
[9] IEEE Std 421.5-2016, IEEE Recommended Practice for Excitation System Models for Power System Stability Studies, 2016. (Standard overview).
[10] MD McKay, RJ Beckman, and WJ Conover, “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code,” Technometrics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 239–245, 1979. doi:10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755.
[11] X. Deng, H. Huang, and C. Lu, “Review of RoCoF estimation techniques for low-inertia power systems,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 9, p. 3708, 2023. doi:10.3390/en16093708.
[12] M.R. Haghifam, M. Abapour, and P. Aliasghari, “Risk-based placement of TCSC for transient stability enhancement,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 3321–3330, 2016. doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.0170.
[13] H. Konara, F. Coffele, and G. Burt, “Co-simulation of real-time electromagnetic transient and transient stability programs for large-scale hybrid AC/DC systems,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 216, 109021, 2023. (Abstract).
[14] T. Cheng, Y. Wang, and D. Wang, “Parallel-in-time-and-space electromagnetic transient simulation of modular multilevel converters with device-level modeling,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 487–498, 2022. doi:10.1049/gtd2.12285.
[15] A. Nasri, H. Shayeghi, and HA Shayanfar, "Using trajectory sensitivity analysis to find suitable placement of series compensators in the power system," Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 112, pp. 68–75, 2014. (Abstract).